<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolverine 35mm Film Scanner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/wolverine-35mm-film-scanner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/wolverine-35mm-film-scanner/</link>
	<description>Learn about digitizing your film and slides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:36:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/wolverine-35mm-film-scanner/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/?p=21#comment-79</guid>
		<description>The problem of blue images was resolved by Wolverine Customer Support who sent me version D of the firmware.  It was very easy to upgrade the firmware.  The scanned images are now very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem of blue images was resolved by Wolverine Customer Support who sent me version D of the firmware.  It was very easy to upgrade the firmware.  The scanned images are now very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/wolverine-35mm-film-scanner/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 10:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/?p=21#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Tom - I think that is a fairly common problem with this scanner. Though, most of the lower-end scanners won&#039;t give the best image quality. Film scanners are a lot like digital cameras. Cheaper digital cameras will still take a picture, but the quality is a far cry from a $1,000+ camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; I think that is a fairly common problem with this scanner. Though, most of the lower-end scanners won&#8217;t give the best image quality. Film scanners are a lot like digital cameras. Cheaper digital cameras will still take a picture, but the quality is a far cry from a $1,000+ camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/wolverine-35mm-film-scanner/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 21:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/?p=21#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I also get images that are too blue.  Is this a common defect or do Debra and I have defective units?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also get images that are too blue.  Is this a common defect or do Debra and I have defective units?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra</title>
		<link>http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/wolverine-35mm-film-scanner/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.35mmfilmscanner.org/?p=21#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I have found this scanner produces pictures that are too blue.  I&#039;m converting about 2500 of my Dad&#039;s slides, so I really don&#039;t have time to go to a software program and try to adjust every one of them.  I need something better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found this scanner produces pictures that are too blue.  I&#8217;m converting about 2500 of my Dad&#8217;s slides, so I really don&#8217;t have time to go to a software program and try to adjust every one of them.  I need something better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
